News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google’s Self-Driving Car Project Is Losing Out to Rivals by Xylakant on Monday September 12, 2016 @11:26AM (#12480507)
A plane autopilot is supposed to be capable of flying the plane unattended and handing over control in an orderly, controlled fashion before critical problems arise [1]. A ships autopilot is expected to do the same. The same should be expected from a car autopilot. The fact that the environment is much much simpler for planes and ships doesn't change the fundamental expectation. As long as car autopilots are not capable of fulfilling the expectation that they can autonomously and safely control a car in a given real-worlds environment with other participant they should not be marketed as autopilots. They're driving assist programs.

[1] there are examples where this did not happen, but they're considered a failure.

Re:Google’s Self-Driving Car Project Is Losing Out to Rivals by skybrian on Monday September 12, 2016 @11:59AM (#12480803)
As far as I know there isn't any autopilot that can fly a plane unattended unless you are flying on instruments. Collisions are avoided by relying on the air traffic control system knowing where all the planes are scheduled to be. (Plus plenty of backup warning systems.)

You can still use an autopilot when flying visually but then it's up to you to watch for traffic. This is using it like cruise control.

Re:Google’s Self-Driving Car Project Is Losing Out to Rivals by Xylakant on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:51PM (#12482545)
> Collisions are avoided by relying on the air traffic control system knowing where all the planes are scheduled to be. (Plus plenty of backup warning systems.)

Yes, perfectly fine. If Teslas autopilot can rely on external traffic control to provide that information, call it autopilot. As long as it can't don't.

Re:Google’s Self-Driving Car Project Is Losing Out to Rivals by assface on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:44PM (#12481866)
> As far as I know there isn't any autopilot that can fly a plane unattended

CMU is working on this (seriously).

Re:Google’s Self-Driving Car Project Is Losing Out to Rivals by danielsju6 on Monday September 12, 2016 @11:33AM (#12480583)
A plane's auto-pilot maintains bearing, altitude, and speed—seems pretty similar to "lane assist" / tesla-autopilot to me.

Some can land, in optimal conditions, but can't taxi.

Re:Google’s Self-Driving Car Project Is Losing Out to Rivals by dogma1138 on Monday September 12, 2016 @11:52AM (#12480740)
Landings are also mostly automated just through a different system(s) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_landing_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoland
Re:Google’s Self-Driving Car Project Is Losing Out to Rivals by grahamburger on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:32PM (#12482371)
Have you tried Tesla's autopilot? It's not far off from your description.
Re:Google’s Self-Driving Car Project Is Losing Out to Rivals by mortehu on Monday September 12, 2016 @07:06PM (#12484390)
I haven't. As I understand it, it basically doesn't work at all in city traffic? Like going across Manhattan on 59th street?
Re:Google’s Self-Driving Car Project Is Losing Out to Rivals by grahamburger on Monday September 12, 2016 @11:23PM (#12485428)
That seems roughly equivalent to taxiing in a plane, something which isn't handled by a plane's autopilot. After using it, it feels very intuitive to understand what it can and can't handle, and it does degrade very gracefully (beeps at you and says 'take steering wheel to maintain speed' if it starts to get confused.) It works very much how I would have expected knowing nothing more than the name.
Re:Google’s Self-Driving Car Project Is Losing Out to Rivals by kmonsen on Monday September 12, 2016 @07:18PM (#12484441)
I can't detect red lights unless the car in front of you stopped for one. So not really.