Re:Why I’m dropping Rust
by topspin on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:33AM
(#12477404)
It occurs to me that these courses have been teaching what might (should?) be considered a naive view of memory; you show me a traditional cyclic data structure and I'll show you a concurrency bug. I suppose that's fine in 1978 when no one imagined they'd be dealing with multi-core microcontrollers, but today, when you find yourself using a "systems" language for non-toy work and you reach for a tool as sharp as a raw pointer, those naive data structures are frequently (usually?) inadequate.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why I’m dropping Rust
by SamReidHughes on Monday September 12, 2016 @04:36AM
(#12478062)
Cyclic data structures are in my experience very useful for concurrency. It's probably the number three good excuse for using a linked list, when you want to hold a lock for O(1) time with no shenanigans. But also, generally, anything that involves communicating information from point A to point B, and waiting on that information, involves some sort of cyclic reference between the sender and listener.