Again, this is a "truthy" claim that is, at present, unsupported by evidence. Repeating speculations such as this does not make them less speculative.

I agree. I am not claiming we have evidence, I'm claiming we go out of our way not to seek it out. As a result, the lack of evidence provides little information as to whether or not fraud occurs.

I.e., if p(evidence|presence) ~= 0, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Of course, it is pretty strange how so many people are strongly against the collection of evidence.