Re:Why Ruby is an acceptable Lisp (2005)
by steveklabnik on Saturday September 10, 2016 @08:23PM
(#12471500)
I don't actually know how I feel about the contents of this article, but it _did_ generate a lot of lively discussion and made a lot of people think. So in that regard, I feel that it's a success.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Ruby is an acceptable Lisp (2005)
by qwertyuiop924 on Saturday September 10, 2016 @08:26PM
(#12471508)
Fair 'nuff. That is a major benefit. Steve Yegge's response is way more interesting than the article itself.