News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Ruby is an acceptable Lisp (2005). Parent comment

Re:Why Ruby is an acceptable Lisp (2005) by sillysaurus3 on Saturday September 10, 2016 @05:24PM (#12470950)
I don't see why this has been posted "three" times before

Posts that are over a year old can be reposted. It's a way to get a fresh perspective on ideas.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Ruby is an acceptable Lisp (2005) by cardiffspaceman on Saturday September 10, 2016 @06:08PM (#12471086)
Maybe an URL checker would implicitly discourage reposts by warning about them.

If the URL checker were to present itself as a helpful aid for reposts ("You might want to use this title like the other 3 posters have used: X") it might avoid that result.

[ Parent | on HN ]