News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Have you ever smoked weed? Answer this question and you c... by bertiewhykovich on Friday September 09, 2016 @07:51PM (#12466861)
I think you're being paranoid. Unless your product is aligned against US interests (or you're Middle Eastern), no border guard is going to care about a French national going to a conference. You're not impersonating someone by using a pseudonym, nor are you committing a crime against US interests. The TSA is obnoxious but ineffective. No one is going to detain you over your pornography unless they want to detain you anyway, and there's no clear reason why that would be the case.
Re:Have you ever smoked weed? Answer this question and you c... by jseliger on Friday September 09, 2016 @07:58PM (#12466888)
He is not: http://io9.gizmodo.com/5497556/sf-author-peter-watts-found-g... or http://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=1186. Anyone, anywhere can be attacked by U.S. border "guards" for any reason, including white Canadians. It is a nearly law-free zone.
Re:Have you ever smoked weed? Answer this question and you c... by mrgordon on Friday September 09, 2016 @08:16PM (#12466975)
I read the first link and it didn't seem entirely clear cut to me that Watts hadn't done anything to incite the episode. Even assuming he hadn't, he was convicted by a jury of ordinary civilians so apparently they empathized with the border guards.

Obviously it goes without saying that its a real shame things could escalate that quickly and I'm not saying the border patrols shouldn't be ashamed.

Re:Have you ever smoked weed? Answer this question and you c... by bertiewhykovich on Friday September 09, 2016 @08:38PM (#12467062)
It seems extremely clear that Watts could have avoided this incident. While the details of the altercation are not unambiguous, Watts was not spontaneously assaulted by an officer: the most charitable possible interpretation is that he angered a border guard by behaving in a non-compliant fashion. Even if one was to accept that the border guards escalated the situation far beyond what was appropriate, it is apparent that, had Watts not inexplicably refused to comply with a legally-appointed officer, he could have almost certainly avoided this outcome.

One can certainly come away from this story with a reasonably justified degree of suspicion towards border security. But the most obvious lesson is that belligerence towards officers is almost certain to make a situation worse.

Re:Have you ever smoked weed? Answer this question and you c... by GunboatDiplomat on Friday September 09, 2016 @08:02PM (#12466912)
The TSA isn't the border patrol/customs. They're airport security.
Re:Have you ever smoked weed? Answer this question and you c... by b0p1x on Friday September 09, 2016 @09:58PM (#12467272)
How do people not get this?
Re:Have you ever smoked weed? Answer this question and you c... by robotresearcher on Friday September 09, 2016 @11:58PM (#12467625)
The commenter doesn't live in the US. God forbid he makes a minor mistake about a foreign country's federal security structure.
Re:Have you ever smoked weed? Answer this question and you c... by tedunangst on Saturday September 10, 2016 @12:15AM (#12467668)
Is it so unreasonable to expect someone afraid of what "they" might do to know who "they" are?
Re:Have you ever smoked weed? Answer this question and you c... by manicdee on Saturday September 10, 2016 @03:41AM (#12468161)
"They" in this case is all the people involved between the cabin door of the aircraft and the exit door of the airport.

As a prospective visitor to your country it doesn't matter which official designation "they" have. It only matters what the outcome will be for me.

Whether the extraordinary reduction and enhanced interrogation is done by one arm or another of your government is irrelevant. That it happens is all that matters.