News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Net Neutrality: Toward a Stupid Internet by dantheman on Tuesday April 06, 2010 @08:33PM (#1246077)
I don't think they fail to see the distinction, but instead of further cementing government control they in fact argue that telcos should lose their government privileges and be left to compete in the market. Sure at first they will have significant advantages but as time goes on competition should be able to function.
Re:Net Neutrality: Toward a Stupid Internet by jbooth on Tuesday April 06, 2010 @08:48PM (#1246101)
Yeah, because if I have a problem with my ISP, I'll just head to the bank, borrow a few hundred billion and build my own backbone.
Re:Net Neutrality: Toward a Stupid Internet by jquery on Tuesday April 06, 2010 @09:57PM (#1246213)
This is sort of funny, but despite receiving many more upvotes than its parent, it displays a startling lack of understanding of the capitalist system.

More likely than you borrowing a few "hundred billion," large, midsize, and even small corporations would invest a "few million" in a city or neighborhood somewhere and use the profits to continue investing in other profitable areas. They might even collaborate and start connecting entire cities together (oh look, a backbone). I find this a much more desirable outcome than a government-run or (the current) psuedo-government run scenario.

Re:Net Neutrality: Toward a Stupid Internet by jbooth on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @05:04PM (#1248448)
Well, ok Mr. Capitalist, why hasn't that happened yet? It's certainly not because the existing cable companies' sterling customer service leaves no room for improvement.
Re:Net Neutrality: Toward a Stupid Internet by dantheman on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @07:44PM (#1248742)
It hasn't happened because most communities grant a monopoly to their cable provider so their can only be one legal cable company in a given area.