News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPL Time Bomb – an interesting approach to FOSS licensing by sokoloff on Friday September 09, 2016 @05:46AM (#12460718)
Independent creation is a valid defense against copyright (as contrasted with patent law where it's not).

If the fix is dead-easy and obvious ("change that = in a if statement to an ==", "add a check for foo", or "make this assignment a 1 instead of a 0"), the GPL license of patch A doesn't prevent anyone from creating (from scratch) patch B that does the same thing. For legal proof purposes, you probably want to ensure that the author of patch B hasn't seen the contents of patch A, though for something as obvious as the cases I present, I'm not even sure I'd worry about that.

Re:GPL Time Bomb – an interesting approach to FOSS licensing by AstralStorm on Friday September 09, 2016 @10:13AM (#12462355)
Additionally, you can always require copyright reassignment for the main repository.
Re:GPL Time Bomb – an interesting approach to FOSS licensing by lightdot on Friday September 09, 2016 @06:04AM (#12460772)
Such things might not even be copyrightable.