News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on ... by mcpherrinm on Friday September 09, 2016 @12:49AM (#12459697)
The Galaxy Note 7 is being recalled over fires that have actually occurred.

So I don't think it's unfair to single them out in this case.

Re:FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on ... by zmmmmm on Friday September 09, 2016 @07:44AM (#12461244)
Most models of phone experience reports of the occasional battery fire. Its just at a rate perhaps an order of magnitude less than the GN7. I suspect the fact that Samsung itself issued a recall is probably the main reason the FAA felt they needed to issue some kind of statement.
Re:FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on ... by mhmiles on Friday September 09, 2016 @12:51AM (#12459705)
It's an issue with batteries manufactured by Samsung SDI. Hong Kong Note 7's have batteries from ATL and are not subject to the recall
Re:FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on ... by hackuser on Friday September 09, 2016 @01:20AM (#12459799)
What are SDI and ATL?
Re:FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on ... by mhmiles on Friday September 09, 2016 @01:38AM (#12459851)
Samsung SDI is their battery manufacturing subsidiary. ATL is Amperex Technology Limited, a Chinese battery manufacturer.
Re:FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on ... by Hydraulix989 on Friday September 09, 2016 @02:41PM (#12464945)
Can anyone more familiar with batteries please describe the issue to us?
Re:FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on ... by urda on Friday September 09, 2016 @02:13AM (#12459963)
> it's pretty unfair to single out Samsung.

Not at all when the common denominator is the fact that it's this specific device.

Re:FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on ... by smegel on Friday September 09, 2016 @12:51AM (#12459703)
> Is this a Samsung-specific problem

A Samsung Galaxy Note 7 problem to be even more specific.