Re:People are still bad at gauging their own interview perfo...
by dmoy on Thursday September 08, 2016 @08:03PM
(#12458606)
On the flip side, as an interviewer I give all candidates the opportunity to use a text editor, and less than 15% of candidates take it. The rest opt for whiteboard.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:People are still bad at gauging their own interview perfo...
by majormajor on Thursday September 08, 2016 @09:13PM
(#12458981)
This was my experience as well (actually, even more extreme). Here's a room with a whiteboard or a laptop+TV. All 10 people I interviewed in that room chose the whiteboard.
One of them mentioned feeling less pressure to have perfect syntax and everything at a whiteboard than in an editor. In retrospect, wish I'd asked more of them about their preference, although at the same time, it wasn't something I judged them on so I wouldn't want them to think I was nitpicking their choice.
I'd probably choose a whiteboard too, honestly, for spatial reasons (able to write up separate things off to the side, easily annotate stuff in a different color to step through the code, etc).
Re:People are still bad at gauging their own interview perfo...
by sigsergv on Thursday September 08, 2016 @10:33PM
(#12459302)
I think that's because a lot of people are already trained to use whiteboard during interview.
Re:People are still bad at gauging their own interview perfo...
by boardwaalk on Thursday September 08, 2016 @08:21PM
(#12458724)
That really truly surprises me. I'm so much quicker and more in my element with a text editor.