Re:It’s Tough Being Over 40 in Silicon Valley
by emodendroket on Thursday September 08, 2016 @06:01PM
(#12457743)
That doesn't make sense. If the problem is that we don't have some sort of licensing board, experience should be more highly valued, not less.
Re:It’s Tough Being Over 40 in Silicon Valley
by drather19 on Thursday September 08, 2016 @07:16PM
(#12458307)
I guess where I was going was that there was a fairly high standard to "get in the door" first, after which experience seems to be valued more uniformly (at least more than in software).
We don't have the equivalent in software, and we also seem to have a recurring discussion about effective ways to filter people during an interview process. I've certainly had mixed results in my limited sample set when considering past experience to actual performance of hires.
Is there a good way to translate the value of someone's experience?
EDIT: For that matter, I guess I should wonder how folks translate the value of people in those other fields effectively (or if they do at all).
Re:It’s Tough Being Over 40 in Silicon Valley
by emodendroket on Friday September 09, 2016 @09:23AM
(#12461899)
I don't know, but if you don't have other qualifications to go on, surely the fact that they were able to hack it at other companies for a long time is the strongest signal you have.
I know understanding CS fundamentals and employer expectations about this are a lightning rod here, so I don't want to apply a value judgement on that here. However, what's the equivalent to the board or bar exams in our field (that lets us compare ourselves to those fields)?