News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Correct Way to Validate Email Addresses by flurdy on Thursday September 08, 2016 @06:53AM (#12451826)
I do as well. Keeps a nice track of which have been leaked (or guessed) by spammers. And easy mail filtering to relevant labels on my side.

But it does get awkward quite a few times when having to interact with a human (customer services, hotel bookings, etc) via email or phone when they get a bit confused why their company name is my email alias....

Spelling a long alias over the phone letter by letter is especially tedious...

Also responding to emails either means I have to configure yet another sender alias, or mostly just send from my normal alias, which sometimes gets rejected or confuse whomever I interact with.

Also hate unsubscribe links that insist on sending unsubscribe email from that alias(mailman etc).

Re:The Correct Way to Validate Email Addresses by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC on Thursday September 08, 2016 @07:33AM (#12452054)
Doesn't solve all of it, but that's why I use random localparts instead. Sometimes people wonder whether the address is correct, but if I confirm that it's ok that it looks weird, people aren't overly confused and just accept it. I then have it all integrated with Mutt so it tags emails with a human-readable label and automatically selects the correct source address when replying.
Re:The Correct Way to Validate Email Addresses by drspacemonkey on Thursday September 08, 2016 @04:44PM (#12457117)
>But it does get awkward quite a few times when having to interact with a human (customer services, hotel bookings, etc) via email or phone when they get a bit confused why their company name is my email alias....

I had that problem so many times that I whipped up a quick Rails app that generates new email addresses. Type in the company name, hit submit. It uses a random project name generator gem to create something like SteelyFishSauce@<mydomain>.com, displays it on the screen, and emails "<Company name> has been associated with SteelyFishSauce@<mydomain>.com" to the spamcatcher address.

Re:The Correct Way to Validate Email Addresses by usrusr on Thursday September 08, 2016 @10:21AM (#12453235)
Same here, same (minor) problems. The human interaction part is pretty much covered when I used [email protected] for registration, but the more provocative variation [email protected] occasionally raises some eyebrows.

The nasty part is replying with the main address as the sender. I'd really love to have email clients with reasonable support for this usage pattern for the platforms I use, but maybe then the pattern might become popular enough to lose some of its advantages.