Re:Lessons from a 45-year Study of Super-Smart Children
by truth_sentinell on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @12:55PM
(#12444990)
I perfectly understand the physical genetics advantages. But people here and everywhere are attributing intelligence to genetics as it was as evident as physical traits.
Re:Lessons from a 45-year Study of Super-Smart Children
by dragonwriter on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @01:48PM
(#12445471)
Intelligence is a physical trait; how could it be anything else?
Whether it's higher endurance, a tiny difference in bone structure, longer arms, greater height, etc. - that's all mostly genetics with a bit of environmental factors mixed in (like childhood nutrition)
But cognitive abilities and intelligence are far less understood, because you simply can't measure it as well as physical achievements (in fact, some of the top comments here gripe about using a PhD degree as a benchmark for achievement; or patents; or publications; or even income level)