News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension fea... by spot on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @10:36AM (#12443729)
there are much worse things, like spamming.
Re:How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension fea... by kuschku on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @11:11AM (#12444031)
Spamming isn’t bad, spamming can be fixed with a spamfilter.

Selling your age, gender, location, preferences, etc to anyone who books an ad? That’s bad.

Re:How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension fea... by bduerst on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @06:33PM (#12448523)
They're not selling your personal information to anyone.

You can read more about how online ads work here: https://privacy.google.com/how-ads-work.html

Re:How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension fea... by kuschku on Thursday September 08, 2016 @04:22PM (#12456931)
Except to a foreign government that is actively hostile towards my rights.

That’s more than enough.

Re:How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension fea... by bduerst on Thursday September 08, 2016 @06:35PM (#12458016)
Because this foreign government is booking ads?

I don't follow your line of reasoning here.

Re:How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension fea... by kuschku on Friday September 09, 2016 @07:29PM (#12466770)
No, they do that in addition to giving information to advertisers.

If any company gives any information about me to a third party, that's already wrong.

And while advertisers don't get the data directly, they get it indirectly. They get the user specification (age, gender, rough location) they bid on, and the IP, and several advertisers even used that to track you between different websites their AdWords ads were shown on.

Re:How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension fea... by bduerst on Saturday September 10, 2016 @03:23PM (#12470534)
They don't give your information, directly or indirectly, to advertisers. Using aggregated information for ad targeting isn't "selling" information to third parties, no matter how hard you try to loosely redefine the semantics of the word.

I'd ask how you think they are giving data to foreign governments, but I have a feeling you'll try to redefine "mandatory court subpoenas for individuals" as the same.