News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Employee #1: Amazon by sillysaurus3 on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @10:08PM (#12440581)
But interviewing isn't about asking someone technical questions. It's about whether the candidate can get work done. I'll never understand the massive debate about the effectiveness of work-sample tests -- no questions, just "Here is some work. Can you do it?"

I've seen how effective it is. And how many people rebel against it. No idea why. Ego, sometimes. It's unfortunate.

Re:Employee #1: Amazon by rpeden on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @10:16PM (#12440602)
I agree that tests like that can be a great way to determine how effective a candidate might be.

I think the same principle applies - if possible, giving everyone the same work sample tests provides a good basis for comparison between candidates.

Re:Employee #1: Amazon by koide on Thursday September 08, 2016 @02:27AM (#12450719)
As long as it remains a secret. Once it's out there it stops being that useful.