Re:Why GitHub Finally Abandoned Its Bossless Workplace
by catwell on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @04:46AM
(#12441700)
No, it's almost the opposite. This kind of thing started happening for the same core reason they added management: because of the Tom Preston-Werner / Julie Ann Horvath scandal two years ago.
It made them understand the importance (and risk for the business) of such issues, so added HR and middle-management with a focus on them. As a side effect we ended up with things like this happening.
The people with an agenda are not random employees in a flat company here, it's the management.
Re:Why GitHub Finally Abandoned Its Bossless Workplace
by kornish on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @09:30PM
(#12440454)
Seems unlikely that an organization of GitHub's size would overhaul the entire management structure to deal with problems brought about by a single employee (or even a few).
Re:Why GitHub Finally Abandoned Its Bossless Workplace
by nommm-nommm on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @09:27PM
(#12440443)
Can you elaborate?
Re:Why GitHub Finally Abandoned Its Bossless Workplace
by brobinson on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @10:41PM
(#12440679)
I think this might be a reference to the "WebM for Retards" repo which was banned. After that event, someone ran a search and found myriad other repos containing "problematic" language which were ignored.
Re:Why GitHub Finally Abandoned Its Bossless Workplace
by SamReidHughes on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @12:33AM
(#12440989)
Not just that repo -- see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12232250
Seems like without management, an employee with an agenda--especially on that's not related to technology--could go off unchecked for a long time.