News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SSL considered bloated by fkooman on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @11:00AM (#12436462)
It seems to make more sense to just have ONE that can accommodate all those scenarios in a secure way. One doesn't solve bloat by introducing more bloat.

I'd say more can be won by removing e.g. ASN.1 and X.509 for certificate handling and encoding that are a very difficult (impossible?) to get right and switch to something simple that solves the 99% use case of current TLS.

Re:SSL considered bloated by tscs37 on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @05:41PM (#12439480)
I agree with ASN.1 and X.509.

Those two are part of my plaintext-offenders list, like SMTP. They make life equally painful for both man and machine.