Re:Revenge porn: More than 200 prosecuted under new law
by PhasmaFelis on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @06:11AM
(#12434801)
New technology enables new crimes, which in turn inspire new laws? Of course that's tech news.
(Besides which, Hacker News is not just for tech news. Read the guidelines.)
Re:Revenge porn: More than 200 prosecuted under new law
by Shonky on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @06:18AM
(#12442068)
I enjoy non-tech news on HN. I should have made myself clearer, that I am kind of disappointed with BBC.
Re:Revenge porn: More than 200 prosecuted under new law
by semi-extrinsic on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @05:52AM
(#12434711)
How do you propose AI figure out based on a movie that the person in the movie consented to the making of the movie, but not to distribution afterwards? I would suggest even a skilled human cannot do that.
Re:Revenge porn: More than 200 prosecuted under new law
by wingerlang on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @06:10AM
(#12434797)
Perhaps it could run facial analysis, find the social media accounts of the person and check the messages. Cross reference with messages of friend and old boyfriends mentioned on e.g. FB relationship status. Run some sentiment analysis towards possible SO's to see if there are bad intentions involved.
I am joking, of course.
Re:Revenge porn: More than 200 prosecuted under new law
by teraflop on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @06:22AM
(#12434855)
I believe that you're joking, but essentially the same concept -- the idea that someone's public-facing behavior is evidence of what they've consented to in private -- is sadly, disturbingly prevalent in sexual assault cases.
Re:Revenge porn: More than 200 prosecuted under new law
by circlefavshape on Tuesday September 06, 2016 @06:41AM
(#12434944)
Afaics this is because there are no other forms of evidence available in sexual assault cases where what's being contested is consent. Two people have had sex, but testify differently over whether one of them said "yes". How do you figure out which one is telling the truth? I know it's very distressing for the victim, but if we keep "innocent until proven guilty" while making circumstantial evidence inadmissible then I don't see how anyone could ever be successfully prosecuted for this kind of assault
Technology how to detect these type of content using AI - that could be a tech news, not merely a fact of some angry ex uploading naughty pics.