Re:Wikileaks gun camera video of civilians shot in Baghdad 0...
by Alex3917 on Monday April 05, 2010 @01:35PM
(#1242466)
Right after this when someone says "Uh, negative" and the other guys ignore him, is that not about the alleged shooting?
Re:Wikileaks gun camera video of civilians shot in Baghdad 0...
by krschultz on Monday April 05, 2010 @01:57PM
(#1242546)
There are seemingly two conversations happening at once, I took the "negative" as referring to location not shooting. Read it as Guy 1 saying "we had a guy shoot, now he's behind the building" and Guy 2 saying "negative, he is not behind the building he was in front of the bradley and I haven't seen him since" rather than Guy 1 saying "We had a guy shoot" and Guy 2 saying "Negative" and you get a completely different picture.
02:15 No hold on. Lets come around. Behind buildings right now from our point of view. ... Okay, we're gonna come around.
02:19 Hotel Two-Six; have eyes on individual with RPG. Getting ready to fire. We won't...
02:23 Yeah, we had a guy shoot---and now he's behind the building.
02:26 God damn it.
02:28 Uh, negative, he was, uh, right in front of the Brad Uh, 'bout, there, one o'clock.
02:34 Haven't seen anything since then.
It's not clear that no one is shooting, though. It's only clear that the available and very limited perspective did not capture such activity.