News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Paris climate deal: US and China announce ratification by tunichtgut on Saturday September 03, 2016 @11:02AM (#12419435)
All these agreements are worthless. The question is, will there be a technology that prevents earth from heating up from burning fossil fuels.
Re:Paris climate deal: US and China announce ratification by dirtyaura on Saturday September 03, 2016 @01:06PM (#12419956)
There is. Constructing nuclear power at the same rate as France did successfully in 70s and 80s would be a big part of the solution.

France constructed 40+ reactors for population of 60 million in ~20 years. If we did same everywhere, we could build ~9000 reactors in 40 years. If one reactor would be on average 1000MW, producing roughly 8TWh yearly, we would get 72000TWh from the nuclear power alone. That is about a half of world's current energy production (155,000TWh).

This would be of course a gigantic political and engineering project, but no major new scientific or technical breakthrough would be needed.

Re:Paris climate deal: US and China announce ratification by semi-extrinsic on Saturday September 03, 2016 @01:06PM (#12419950)
We have the technology for large scale carbon capture, that's no problem. The problem is that carbon capture is pure cost, no gain (measurable on a company balance sheet).

To solve this, we need a global carbon tax, probably close to $100/ton. For reference, US emissions per capita is ~17 tons.

Re:Paris climate deal: US and China announce ratification by drjesusphd on Sunday September 04, 2016 @11:10AM (#12424712)
> To solve this, we need a global carbon tax, probably close to $100/ton. For reference, US emissions per capita is ~17 tons.

This seems... remarkably affordable. For the US, this is less than TARP. We really need to get our act together.

Re:Paris climate deal: US and China announce ratification by noiv on Saturday September 03, 2016 @04:13PM (#12420952)
For a start, there are bikes...