Not really relevant to tarsnap (I've never found an efficient way to spend money to acquire customers in the short term; instead I focus on longer-term branding) but I can absolutely see that it fits some companies.
>Not really relevant to tarsnap (I've never found an efficient way to spend money to acquire customers in the short term; instead I focus on longer-term branding) but I can absolutely see that it fits some companies.
Isn't backup a kind of sticky service? I mean once I have purchased your service, as long as I am not facing any issues I am unlikely to change the provider. So LTV calculations should be relatively more predictable to your business.
For example, I use Dropbox for personal online storage and backup purpose. It has worked well so far and haven't considered switching in years.
Anyways, not trying to tell you how to run your business. Just curious. Yours is really an intersting product. Best of luck.
If a customer will pay $100, and it costs $90 to acquire them, without taking time into consideration it would look like $10 in profit. But if you have to spend the $90 today, and you only get the $100 in five years, they might not actually be a profitable customer. Conversely, if that same $100 revenue customer cost $105 to acquire, but they paid today and you only spent $105 to acquire them in five years they might actually be profitable (this scenario is probably less likely, but maybe if you are acquiring them through some channel where the costs are deferred for some reason).
Excel and a lot of other spreadsheets have a built in NPV function to make the calculation easier. You can simply give it the series of expected costs and revenue associated with the customer, and a discount rate (how much to discount future cash by, compounded annually) and it will give you the NPV.
When I was at FreshBooks in 2008/2009 we figured out our Cost Per Acquisition (CPA) and our per-customer Life Time Value (LTV) / Net Present Value (NPV). We were making about 3x on marketing spend over a period of about 2.5 years. Effectively a 55% compounding yearly ROI. Could we wait, sure, but why? Even at credit card levels of interest we were still winning, and if we didn't our competitors would soon figure out the game and they'd gain market share at our expense.