News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: 2016 Report. Parent comment

Re:One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: 2016 R... by ThomPete on Friday September 02, 2016 @12:05AM (#12410761)
I have never said anything about experts. I have talked about general consensus which includes experts.

You have provided on example, ONE of someone who believed it would happen.

I have provided one expert plus articles saying it wouldn't happen, plus you can google and find plenty of articles that said we wouldn't get it for a long time.

You cannot find a single example of articles which are claiming that it's was a general consensus we would beat Go.

And so you are the one coming up short not me. My claim is not controversial neither have you shown it is.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: 2016 R... by 2bitencryption on Friday September 02, 2016 @02:32AM (#12411265)
Point for ThomPete on this one. I can find many more sources citing experts pegging computer go at a decade+ off, compared to those who thought we would have it by now.

However, points to argonaut for doing his best Dijkstra impersonation.

'I don't know how many of you have ever met Dijkstra, but you probably know that arrogance in computer science is measured in nano-Dijkstras.' - Alan Kay

[ Parent | on HN ]