News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral by wfunction on Thursday September 01, 2016 @02:47PM (#12407854)
How good is the photo quality? Is it close to entry-level DSLRs'?
Re:A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral by Tloewald on Thursday September 01, 2016 @03:13PM (#12408061)
It's shockingly good for what it is, which is why the camera was sold out for six months and still commands pretty much its original retail price nearly a year after release.

Its big weakness is autofocus speed (making it useless for birders, etc.)

Re:A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral by icanhackit on Thursday September 01, 2016 @08:15PM (#12409823)
> Its big weakness is autofocus speed

In my experience the autofocus speed in daylight is fine and it's especially good at focusing on what you want it to focus on, so it's great for birders. The problem is noise-reduction i.e. image quality. Do a bit of pixel peeping and it begins to look like a watercolor painting.

I was lucky enough to get one the day it was released early last year. Fun toy, and great for travel/sightseeing where you often can't use your feet as a zoom, but not even close to 1" type sensor quality let alone SLR.

Saving my pennies for a Sony RX10 III 24-600mm equiv superzoom, thought it's roughly 3 times the price of the P900. Good review here: https://youtu.be/Ad1JDfmyNxI

Re:A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral by lobster_johnson on Thursday September 01, 2016 @03:08PM (#12408018)
Not even close to a DSLR. It uses a small compact-style sensor (6.17 x 4.55mm), which is about 14 times smaller than an APS-C sensor (e.g. Nikon D5500 at 23.5 mm x 15.6 mm).
Re:A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral by macintux on Thursday September 01, 2016 @02:59PM (#12407946)