News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The king of smokers by dragonwriter on Thursday September 01, 2016 @11:54AM (#12406317)
The upthread question about why inhaling smoke would be harmful if "ordinary air" was not pretty clearly used "ordinary air" to mean at least "air without smoke", since inhaling "smoke" is always inhaling "air with smoke", and it would be silly to ask the question if both alternatives meant "air with smoke".
Re:The king of smokers by nilkn on Thursday September 01, 2016 @12:56PM (#12406910)
The upthread question also mentioned heat, so one could also say that "smoke" was pretty clearly used to refer to something like dense, hot cigarette smoke dragged right off a lit cigarette and inhaled directly, not the sort of "smoke" that's involved in city air.