News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Mathematics of Charles Sanders Peirce (2001) [pdf] by dmfdmf on Thursday September 01, 2016 @02:17AM (#12403400)
Not sure why this is trending on HN (and without any comments or discussion). TBH, its reads like a Sokal Hoax and seems like gibberish to me.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair

Re:The Mathematics of Charles Sanders Peirce (2001) [pdf] by ykler on Thursday September 01, 2016 @02:59AM (#12403517)
This is not like the Sokal hoax at all. Sure the writer has a few English departmentish affectations, but the article is basically just explaining Peirce's logic. And Peirce is one of roughly two people in history to figure out quantification.
Re:The Mathematics of Charles Sanders Peirce (2001) [pdf] by gballan on Thursday September 01, 2016 @02:39AM (#12403459)
Peirce's diagramatic logic is the forerunner to Sowa's conceptual graphs [0]. Worth a look.

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_graph

Re:The Mathematics of Charles Sanders Peirce (2001) [pdf] by MrQuincle on Thursday September 01, 2016 @02:44AM (#12403479)
Not sure either. Semiotics is a philosophical branch of linguistics.

De Saussure and Peirce I put conceptually in the same tradition of Cyc and other symbolic/ontological/semantic efforts in knowledge engineering.

That being said, symbol grounding does not get enough attention in current connectionist systems. How to properly present grammar, time, pointers, signs?