News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Undermining of American Charity by JoshTriplett on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @12:18PM (#12399412)
> The tax break is equivalent to a matching program coming from public funds.

No, not even remotely. It's a mechanism to reduce public funds and leave more money in people's hands. In accounting terms, a tax deduction doesn't belong in the "expenses" column; it decreases the "revenue" column.

> Thought experiment: if you were setting up a matching program that used public money (i.e. tax income), what would your criteria be? Is that an appropriate use of public funds at all?

Almost never, no. The only case I can think of that would ever be appropriate might be as a means of allowing people to direct spending in a particular area already considered within the purview of government, allowing people to select from a variety of competing services while amplifying their spending power to allow them to afford something considered a necessity. As a means of re-introducing competition to improve quality, it might make sense. (But only after carefully determining that the expenditure in question should actually fall within in the scope of government.)

Re:The Undermining of American Charity by Retric on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @02:13PM (#12400281)
Money is fungible. There is no difference from me handing you a dollar and then you handing it back to me and me not handing you a dollar.