AWS S3 open source alternative written in Go

Re:AWS S3 open source alternative written in Go by viraptor on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @05:42PM (#12394173)

Other alternatives:

ceph - http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/s3/

swift - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/APIFeatureComparison#A...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AWS S3 open source alternative written in Go by theanalyst on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @05:50PM (#12394231)

Also ceph (& swift) are known to scale well in prod. clusters with over 30+ PB of data (at least looking at CERN's cluster) and the latest version of RGW does support geographic redundancy for S3 like apis

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AWS S3 open source alternative written in Go by shinydevops on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @07:54PM (#12394900)

+1 for Ceph. We're running several ~3.5 PB clusters in production. We've not taken advantage of the new RGW features in Jewel, but it works well as an object storage solution.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AWS S3 open source alternative written in Go by dekobon on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @05:55PM (#12394265)

Don't forget:

manta - https://www.joyent.com/manta

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AWS S3 open source alternative written in Go by dc2447 on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @02:25AM (#12396361)

CEPH is a volume service not an object storage service.

SWIFT is indeed analogous to S3.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AWS S3 open source alternative written in Go by viraptor on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @04:33AM (#12396831)

Come on, I literally linked to a website describing "CEPH OBJECT GATEWAY S3 API"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AWS S3 open source alternative written in Go by XorNot on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @03:36AM (#12396596)

Ceph is object storage first. The volume service is implemented on top of that.

[ Parent | on HN ]