News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ruminations on D: An Interview with Walter Bright by stonemetal on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @03:19PM (#12393049)
Always:

    import std.c.stdio;

    int main() {
	int x = 7;
	int* p = &x;
	 printf ("%d\n", *(p + 1));
	return 0;
    }
This compiles in D and violates memory safety.

If you prefer a documentation answer(https://dlang.org/spec/arrays.html#pointers) These are simple pointers to data, analogous to C pointers. Pointers are provided for interfacing with C and for specialized systems work. There is no length associated with it, and so there is no way for the compiler or runtime to do bounds checking, etc., on it.

Re:Ruminations on D: An Interview with Walter Bright by WalterBright on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @04:01PM (#12393378)
Add '@safe' to main()'s declaration and it will no longer compile.
Re:Ruminations on D: An Interview with Walter Bright by notriddle on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @12:08PM (#12399324)

    import std.stdio;

    @safe int f() {
      int* x = new int(6);
      delete x;  // !!
      return *x; // !!!!
    }

    @safe void main() {
      writeln(f());
    }
Re:Ruminations on D: An Interview with Walter Bright by nialv7 on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @07:46PM (#12402297)
'delete' is in the process of being deprecated: https://dlang.org/deprecate.html#delete