News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Born to Rest by ars on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @02:27PM (#12392611)
None of those things you mentioned are exercise. They are physical activity yes, but productive (including mentally productive) physical activity.

Exercise is physical activity without being productive at all.

Re:Born to Rest by justinator on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @03:30PM (#12393145)
But that's false. While exercising, we socialize, we can explore our immediate surroundings as well as provide a useful function, like getting to work. Are you saying my commute by bike isn't exercise? Do you think dancing isn't now seen as a form of exercise?
Re:Born to Rest by kornish on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @03:40PM (#12393222)
You seem to be contradicting yourself, confusing "things which happen to be exercise" with "things which are intentionally exercise."

Your argument was originally that the ancients performed the latter, but you've supported yourself with examples of the former. Hunter-gatherer tribes certainly did and do activities which happen to be exercise all the time, and that (and other reasons) are why they didn't need to set aside time and energy for the express purpose of staying in shape.

Re:Born to Rest by justinator on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @04:32PM (#12393619)
I'm really not. What I'm disagreeing with is the idea that exercise is defined as physical activity without productive value. It certainly could be that but only because that's what we now frame it as, which itself is a purely contemporary idea. No wonder "exersice" today seems so pointless. Much of the modern world is without the ritual it once possessed. And then we defend our new ways as more pure. For me, it's a head scratcher.
Re:Born to Rest by Mithaldu on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @07:15PM (#12394724)
Exercise is maintenance of the body. Maintenance of any machine is productive.
Re:Born to Rest by Retra on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @11:57PM (#12395928)
No it's not. Some machines are too far lost to put worthwhile effort into.
Re:Born to Rest by yarou on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @01:03AM (#12396139)
That's why we upgrade machines (either through pharmaceuticals, and soon, I suspect, gene therapy. Introduce the caloric restriction gene and suddenly the urge to eat uncontrollably goes away.)

Hell, most legal stimulants are appetite suppressants anyway. There are always options. Comparing humans to machines is probably one of the most bizarre expressions of materialism/physicalism I have ever seen on here. The analogy is also quite poor, the human body is far more complex than even our greatest machines.

Re:Born to Rest by sgift on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @02:22AM (#12396355)
> The analogy is also quite poor, the human body is far more complex than even our greatest machines.

For now at least. Progress is slow, but we work on making more complex machines all the time. Also, I have a nagging feeling that we tend to underestimate the quality/complexity of machines and overestimate that of our bodies, probably due to some "we must respect nature/evolution/god/.." beliefs. Human bodies are very lacking in some respects, and it shows.