Re:Paid $75k to Love a Brand on Instagram – Is It an Ad?
by Retric on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @01:36PM
(#12392125)
Be civil > Well thats a naive opinion.
Civil commentary is about more than just language choice. As a rule of thumb object to content, not meta information. You can replacing dumb with naive, but the underlining commentary is about the messenger not the message.
Now, with some actual commentary it's less obvious. But, when the entire comment is simply a snippy one liner it's just filler. As it stands I can guess what the objection was, but not in any meaningful fashion.
PS: If I would change the rules I would make it clear that it makes boring reading is one of the major things to avoid.
Civil commentary is about more than just language choice. As a rule of thumb object to content, not meta information. You can replacing dumb with naive, but the underlining commentary is about the messenger not the message.
Now, with some actual commentary it's less obvious. But, when the entire comment is simply a snippy one liner it's just filler. As it stands I can guess what the objection was, but not in any meaningful fashion.
PS: If I would change the rules I would make it clear that it makes boring reading is one of the major things to avoid.