News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Drool – A Lightweight Markup Language by SamBam on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @01:21PM (#12391996)
> Compared with markdown, drool is minimal without signals like [ or !. drool will not make a literary article look like programming codes.

looks at demo screenshot

> There is @@a link to @@./demo.webp https://www.google.com/ncr

Re:Drool – A Lightweight Markup Language by dou4cc on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @08:33AM (#12397784)
The link content is "a link to @@./demo.webp". "@@./demo.webp" is a picture. Is drool not minimal enough?
Re:Drool – A Lightweight Markup Language by SamBam on Friday September 02, 2016 @09:23AM (#12412823)
The content is exactly as I posted it above. There is an @@ before "a link".

I was just saying that this seemed exactly as arbitrary as "[", which is what drool said it was avoiding.