Re:The Myth of RAM (2014)
by Jweb_Guru on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @12:53PM
(#12391736)
The article points out that accessing n words of RAM takes O(nsqrt(n)), which is not dominated by O(n), which is my entire point here. And in the cache-oblivious model (for example), big-O notation is still alive and well; there are just additional variables introduced to account for the various constants.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.