News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Blazing Fast HTML: Elm vs. React vs. Angular vs. Ember by shamsalmon on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @11:06AM (#12390795)
Whats the difference between a few seconds of loading time for a site that only needs to load its bundle once? Sure its nice for it be faster but the main benefit I thought is you don't need to reload pages as you navigate.
Re:Blazing Fast HTML: Elm vs. React vs. Angular vs. Ember by divbit on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @11:15AM (#12390886)
Possibly misunderstood the article, but it seems they are comparing performance once the bundle is already loaded. That said, as someone who personally prefers using browser over apps ( at least for content consumption, rather than something like a password manager) it is nice to have things boot up quickly.
Re:Blazing Fast HTML: Elm vs. React vs. Angular vs. Ember by the_duke on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @11:14AM (#12390878)
This benchmark has nothing to do with page load time.

It's about rendering time, when everything is already loaded.