Re:Commission says Ireland granted undue tax benefits of up ...
by chupy on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @09:15AM
(#12389718)
Sure, there was some news that EC has dealt with Amazon, Starbucks, InBev but did they actually pay anything back? Did they appeal? Last I heard for InBev the Belgian Finance minister said: "the consequences for the companies concerned would be considerable and the reimbursement itself would be particularly complex" aka will take forever and we will probably not really do it.
Re:Commission says Ireland granted undue tax benefits of up ...
by pwinnski on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @10:27AM
(#12390452)
It has taken a number of years for the investigation of Apple to reach this point, and the investigations of Starbucks, Amazon, and InBev are ongoing. I don't believe your "aka" summary is accurate.
Re:Commission says Ireland granted undue tax benefits of up ...
by masklinn on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @10:48AM
(#12390628)
I believe the Starbucks case is "over" and they're to pay 30m in owed taxes.
Re:Commission says Ireland granted undue tax benefits of up ...
by chupy on Wednesday August 31, 2016 @03:46AM
(#12396636)
The investigation for those three companies mentioned is complete and they have to pay the taxes. Now if they finally will do after years of appeals that's a different question. That was my "aka" summary.
Whether or not there is an agreement between Apple and Ireland or just an understanding that Ireland would not tax them on almost any income is irrelevant. The point of the matter is that the effect of the scheme has been that Apple has paid next to nothing in tax on all European profits in more than a decade, spanning from the sale of your first iPod to your newest iPhone. That income has been channeled through the Irish companies and Ireland has not taxed it with it's usual corporate tax (which, by the way is now merely 12.5 percent). It is appalling.