Re:California bans ITT tech from accepting new students
by HarryHirsch on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @09:10AM
(#12389686)
they'd cut him off and go for whatever had the lowest monthly payment
What if this were a rational decision? For a person with low disposable income and no savings choosing the lowest monthly payment is the most rational decision.
Re:California bans ITT tech from accepting new students
by dkersten on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @11:03AM
(#12390758)
Well, it seems like the most rational decision. Whether or not it is, I guess, depends very much on the persons situation.
For example, if you need to buy a car now (eg because you rely on it for work or something and can't wait to buy), then sure, it might very well be. On the other hand, if that's not true, then saving the monthly payment until you can buy it outright is much more rational (and cheaper). I understand that many people can't do that, however.
Re:California bans ITT tech from accepting new students
by WalterBright on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @01:56PM
(#12392308)
I neglected to mention a key point. When he'd show them a plan with a much lower total cost, but a higher monthly payment, they'd accuse him of trying to trick them into a higher payment. No way were they going to fall for that one.
They certainly believed they were making the most rational decision. It didn't help that used car salesmen don't have a reputation for honest dealings.
The instructor of my accounting class was a former used car salesman. He said that his customers didn't want to hear about total cost, they were only interested in the monthly payment. He'd try to explain, and they'd cut him off and go for whatever had the lowest monthly payment.