News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California bans ITT tech from accepting new students by jeffdavis on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @01:19AM (#12387700)
22% vs 8% is not as big of a difference as I expected. It is plausible to explain that difference by the type of students likely to attend ITT vs a 4 year public university.
Re:California bans ITT tech from accepting new students by bane on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @09:09AM (#12389683)
The students who are likely to go to these trade schools are often better served by the Community College system, but often don't know/understand it as an option.

One interesting statistic, <20% of CC students take out loans for school (the cost is generally low enough they can pay out of pocket), but ~20% of those students also default.

Re:California bans ITT tech from accepting new students by FireBeyond on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @01:53AM (#12387815)
Nearly three times as likely to default on federal loans? And nearly six times as likely to default on private loans (I saw 11% as the rate). That's a pretty big difference.
Re:California bans ITT tech from accepting new students by sdenton4 on Tuesday August 30, 2016 @01:40AM (#12387780)
And 64% amongst those with loans to default on...