Re:There are no particles, there are only fields (2012)
by Ono-Sendai on Monday August 29, 2016 @09:37AM
(#12381726)
Boundary-induced quantisation does explain the limited set of acceptable/stable wavelengths around e.g. an atom.
However, what it doesn't explain, is why the amplitudes of such wavefunctions should be what they are. For example, why should the integral of the squared norm of the wavefunction for an electron be 1, if it is not a particle?
However, what it doesn't explain, is why the amplitudes of such wavefunctions should be what they are. For example, why should the integral of the squared norm of the wavefunction for an electron be 1, if it is not a particle?