Pythran: a Python to C++ compiler with a focus on scientific computing

Re:Pythran: a Python to C++ compiler with a focus on scienti... by jjawssd on Monday August 29, 2016 @09:03AM (#12381548)

You are right. Just like we should all just be using Word 97 on Windows 95 because, you know, word processing is just word processing in the end, isn't it?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pythran: a Python to C++ compiler with a focus on scienti... by dagw on Monday August 29, 2016 @09:17AM (#12381625)

I take it you don't remember the Office 2000 -> 2003 upgrade debacle and peoples unwillingness to just get on board. Most people I know simply skipped 2003 and only reluctantly hopped to 2007 after much gnashing of teeth. I still know a handful of people still using Word 2000.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pythran: a Python to C++ compiler with a focus on scienti... by snovv_crash on Monday August 29, 2016 @11:23AM (#12382455)

Use whatever you know works for your usecase. Look at George R.R. Martin for one example.

[ Parent | on HN ]