News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Opera server breach incident by cisstrd on Sunday August 28, 2016 @06:43AM (#12376042)
If there are no interesting comments to read why post the fact that it had been previously submitted at all? This is completely useless!
Re:Opera server breach incident by tokenizerrr on Sunday August 28, 2016 @07:36AM (#12376133)
Since the person to post this comment also posted that submission, probably because they're unhappy that their submission didn't catch on yet it's the exact same subject. Sadly, shit happens.
Re:Opera server breach incident by cisstrd on Sunday August 28, 2016 @07:44AM (#12376145)
But the person has to realize that this won't help him/her at all, only comes off as being a little bit whiny, maybe even a little bit desperate. Yeah, it happens, but it's only virtual points on an Internet site we are talking about... who cares who submitted it in the end.

EDIT: Hope I haven't offended anyone, I am usually not the judgemental type, couldn't help wondering in this case.

Re:Opera server breach incident by denzil_correa on Sunday August 28, 2016 @09:22AM (#12376397)
Personally, I think that there should be minimal dupes. Therefore, I felt the earlier submission which did not gain traction should be deleted from HN and/or merged. I'm not sure of the protocol.

I wasn't aware this came across as desperate for virtual points. I really don't care.

Re:Opera server breach incident by cisstrd on Monday August 29, 2016 @09:51AM (#12381807)
Fair enough :)
Re:Opera server breach incident by tokenizerrr on Sunday August 28, 2016 @07:50AM (#12376158)
I agree. Like I said, shit happens :)