In rich and poor countries, researchers turn to Sci-Hub

Re:In rich and poor countries, researchers turn to Sci-Hub by zyxley on Saturday August 27, 2016 @08:00PM (#12374718)

> perhaps require renewal half way through to prove the work is still economical, etc.

This reminds me of one of the copyright reform ideas I've seen that has a tremendously practical approach to the power of the Mouse: an initial 20- or 40-year term, with an indefinite number of renewals of the same length allowed, but each renewal requiring filing with the Library of Congress and a substantial fee.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:In rich and poor countries, researchers turn to Sci-Hub by userbinator on Saturday August 27, 2016 @10:41PM (#12375075)

but each renewal requiring filing with the Library of Congress and a substantial fee.

I believe the idea was to make the fee increase exponentially too.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:In rich and poor countries, researchers turn to Sci-Hub by imtringued on Sunday August 28, 2016 @04:50AM (#12375840)

I think the idea of renewing individual works indefinitively for a flat fee is good enough. If Disney really wants to keep Mickey Mouse and has enough money then let them keep him. But please don't forcibly delay the copyright expiration of everything else.

[ Parent | on HN ]