Re:Movfuscator – A single-instruction C compiler
by mighty_atomic_c on Saturday August 27, 2016 @12:27PM
(#12372997)
Seems like it would give a large performance penalty. I don't get it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Movfuscator – A single-instruction C compiler
by detaro on Saturday August 27, 2016 @12:28PM
(#12373004)
It's a joke/demonstration that it is possible, not something you're supposed to use.
Re:Movfuscator – A single-instruction C compiler
by posterboy on Saturday August 27, 2016 @01:06PM
(#12373178)
Obfuscation is surely used in malware.
One instruction set computers (OISC) are more than a joke, I suppose, but I didn't dig far into theoretical computer science and can't say, what's important about them.
I read a comment the other day, that stipulated neurons would be akin to massively parallel single instruction computers.
Re:Movfuscator – A single-instruction C compiler
by stcredzero on Saturday August 27, 2016 @07:43PM
(#12374673)
One instruction set computers (OISC) are more than a joke, I suppose, but I didn't dig far into theoretical computer science and can't say, what's important about them.
They're for highly parallel programable SIMD number crunching. The OISC would allow for easily fabricating a whole heaping bunch of ALUs.
Re:Movfuscator – A single-instruction C compiler
by hulahoof on Saturday August 27, 2016 @01:07PM
(#12373186)
There is a good talk that accompanies the code
Re:Movfuscator – A single-instruction C compiler
by caretStick on Saturday August 27, 2016 @09:44PM
(#12374948)
source?