News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:G.E., the 124-Year-Old Software Start-Up by CyberDildonics on Saturday August 27, 2016 @11:20AM (#12372707)
You would think it would be cheaper to pay more or give better benefits.
Re:G.E., the 124-Year-Old Software Start-Up by hanniabu on Saturday August 27, 2016 @11:47AM (#12372815)
These commercials are made to lure tech talent by letting them know they're more than the industrial mechanical company they used to be and need people with modern tech skill sets as opposed to knowing how to sling a hammer.
Re:G.E., the 124-Year-Old Software Start-Up by tacostakohashi on Saturday August 27, 2016 @12:29PM (#12373011)
At a smaller scale, certainly. If you're talking thousands of developers, marketing yourself as a good place to work becomes cheaper than paying well (i.e., actually being a good place to work).
Re:G.E., the 124-Year-Old Software Start-Up by halomru on Saturday August 27, 2016 @12:50PM (#12373118)
>paying well (i.e., actually being a good place to work).

I don't think good pay and good place to work are synonymous in any way. They happen to be correlated because both are methods to attract talent, but one does not cause the other.

Re:G.E., the 124-Year-Old Software Start-Up by gaius on Saturday August 27, 2016 @03:09PM (#12373694)
You can bet they paid zillions to McKinsey or someone, to absolutely minimize their costs for doing it.