News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Typelevel Scala by yummyfajitas on Saturday August 27, 2016 @11:07AM (#12372645)
If you scroll up, you'll see I was replying to this:

it's desperate desire to turn Scala into Haskell ends up turning an awesome ML-inspired language into a vastly inferior religious (...ahem, pure) language. But Cats and Shapeless aren't Scalaz.

I claim that from a technical perspective they are more or less equivalent and they only forked due to a feud. So if you want to avoid Haskell-inspired constructs in Scalaz, Cats won't be much to your liking either.

Glad we are on the same page!

Re:Typelevel Scala by premium-concern on Saturday August 27, 2016 @11:19AM (#12372702)
And if you scroll up, you'll see that this wasn't me.

I don't have issues with Haskell-inspired constructs, I have issues with Haskell-inspired behavior.