News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon is piloting teams with a 30-hour workweek by andrewguenther on Saturday August 27, 2016 @12:39AM (#12371017)
> But it isn't universal.

Neither are people being highly productive without "adult supervision."

In all seriousness, I find your comment incredibly insulting. I gave an opinion based off of experience, that doesn't mean that I'm some sort of child that needs to be supervised.

> the specific type of person who ends up working where you work

I typically prefer to keep my comments here civil, but seriously? Fuck you.

Re:Amazon is piloting teams with a 30-hour workweek by krisdol on Saturday August 27, 2016 @01:50AM (#12371199)
> I gave an opinion based off of experience, that doesn't mean that I'm some sort of child that needs to be supervised.

It also doesn't mean you're an expert. Next time you give your opinion, try not being insulting, and help us understand why you have that opinion. You gave one sentence that painted everyone working from home as lazy, and stated it as a fact.

I work from home when I need to be more productive. The office has too many coworkers with ad hoc questions that apparently aren't important enough to ask online.

Re:Amazon is piloting teams with a 30-hour workweek by obstacle1 on Saturday August 27, 2016 @09:22AM (#12372240)
Your post was a general statement that working from home is usually light on working.

Stop and think about that for a second. Many of us here are 100% remote. How are we to interpret your general statement, except as insulting?

A little self-awareness would be far more helpful to you than lashing out in anger.

Re:Amazon is piloting teams with a 30-hour workweek by dasmoth on Saturday August 27, 2016 @04:44AM (#12371595)
>>> Neither are people being highly productive without "adult supervision."

This may be true, but it's frustrating when that just gets assumed.