Re:New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection
by spikels on Friday August 26, 2016 @05:33PM
(#12369468)
Seems like whenever NPR reports on subjects I happen to know really really well I find myself disappointed. Makes me wonder about the rest of their reporting.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection
by succstressful on Friday August 26, 2016 @08:40PM
(#12370287)
This generally goes for all media entities. Similar scrutiny should be applied to all subjects, not just those for which we're experts. It's a common fallacy to take news of unfamiliar subjects at face value, while understanding that there is far more to the stories we know well than that which is contained in one piece of media.
Re:New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection
by paavokoya on Saturday August 27, 2016 @12:23AM
(#12370959)
NPR is almost as bad as CNN and such, but it's marketed towards intellectuals through linguistics. I noticed whenever they speak on a topic I'm deeply familiar with, they use overly-complicated wordage to get the point across while missing important details. Almost like how "over-designed" websites usually have terrible backends.
Re:New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection
by triplesec on Saturday August 27, 2016 @07:23PM
(#12374628)
Still beats most radio media or TV 'news' for attempting to be accurate!
Re:New Virus Breaks the Rules of Infection
by PhasmaFelis on Saturday August 27, 2016 @12:48AM
(#12371051)
"Not quite up to the standards of a topic expert" is still a damn sight better than most science reporting.