Re:HackedThat: Breaking in to a hardened server via the back...
by breakingcups on Friday August 26, 2016 @05:50AM
(#12365225)
Wow, that's great, I never considered doing that. Thanks!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:HackedThat: Breaking in to a hardened server via the back...
by startling on Friday August 26, 2016 @11:23PM
(#12370786)
It's only marginally helpful: it doesn't actually prevent attackers from uploading code to your server.
Instead of having 'nc -l 8080 | bash' or whatever as your payload, an attacker can just run code instead. "pwd > /var/www/html/exfiltration.html". If they absolutely need a shell, they could e.g. alter nginx or its config files to run `bash` on POSTs to a hidden route.
This does make it a little trickier, and potentially a little easier to detect. But it certainly doesn't make it so that "they cannot download new code".
Re:HackedThat: Breaking in to a hardened server via the back...
by voidlogic on Monday August 29, 2016 @10:29AM
(#12382041)
>This does make it a little trickier, and potentially a little easier to detect.
Correct, I should have said, it eliminates many easy ways to download code. Defense is depth is all about making the attackers job harder and increasing their likelihood of being detected.