University of Chicago: ‘We Do Not Support So-Called Trigger Warnings’

Re:University of Chicago: ‘We Do Not Support So-Called Trigg... by Navarr on Thursday August 25, 2016 @07:50PM (#12363359)

It can be, yes.

But if you're trying to discuss native american problems and someone just keeps interjecting that focusing on native american problems is racist - then you're not really getting anywhere either - was sort of my point.

I don't think they exist to stifle opposing viewpoints, but to at least attempt sane discussion on certain topics that would otherwise not get the opportunity to be discussed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:University of Chicago: ‘We Do Not Support So-Called Trigg... by jaredklewis on Thursday August 25, 2016 @11:24PM (#12364085)

But wasn't it possible to discuss ideas amongst allies before safe spaces? I think groups like AIM, for example, provide a great forum for such activities. Likewise, I think student advocacy groups are an excellent idea.

What I don't like about the concept of safe spaces–and I say concept because I have never actually experienced one– is that I would prefer universities, which often have connections with government, to have as few censorship powers as possible.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:University of Chicago: ‘We Do Not Support So-Called Trigg... by aNoob7000 on Thursday August 25, 2016 @08:49PM (#12363577)

The example you are using of someone that keeps interrupting is really not a safe space issue to me but really a professor allowing someone to be rude.

There's no need for safe spaces just a professor who can allow for ideas to be exchanged in class whether they are hurtful or not and keep the discussion civil and moving forward.

[ Parent | on HN ]