Re:Arguments against JSON-driven development
by joelcorrea on Thursday August 25, 2016 @10:48AM
(#12359404)
Pretty much statically typed vs dinamically-typed discussion. It depends on your particular case, if there is a sufficiently defined schema or not
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Arguments against JSON-driven development
by ajmurmann on Thursday August 25, 2016 @11:10AM
(#12359587)
I don't see how this is related to statically typed vs dynamically typed. This is more a case of Primitive Obsession http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?PrimitiveObsession and a lack of a adapter/serialization layer.
Re:Arguments against JSON-driven development
by joelcorrea on Thursday August 25, 2016 @12:57PM
(#12360564)
I meant, typed vs not-typed. Someone mentioned Clojure, and for me thats the whole point: on one hand, and for a whole category of problems the best abstraction is not to have a strong schema, given the variable parts. On the other hand however there are scenarios where you already know the structure sufficiently well. A matter of abstraction IMO