News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Airlander 10: Longest aircraft damaged during flight. Parent comment

Re:Airlander 10: Longest aircraft damaged during flight by zefhous on Wednesday August 24, 2016 @11:52AM (#12352904)
It's true the aerostatic lift would help here, but the Airlander 10 is not actually a lighter-than-air aircraft. It's a hybrid and requires aerodynamic lift from forward movement in addition to lift from its engine-driven propellers.

The hybrid approach is puzzling to me because there are a multitude of advantages to be gained by being fully lighter-than-air.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Airlander 10: Longest aircraft damaged during flight by tim333 on Thursday August 25, 2016 @10:46AM (#12359387)
I can think of a couple of advantages of hybrids. You could unload cargo without the thing trying to shoot up in the air and a problem with airships in general is them being blown around by the wind which may be less bad with a smaller hybrids. Also if you emergency land the thing may stay there whereas a fully lighter than air one would tend to drift off.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Airlander 10: Longest aircraft damaged during flight by TrainedMonkey on Wednesday August 24, 2016 @12:14PM (#12353077)
Is 'not actually lighter-than-air' always true, or only when it is carrying 10 tons of cargo?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Airlander 10: Longest aircraft damaged during flight by zefhous on Wednesday August 24, 2016 @12:45PM (#12353331)
My understanding is that when talking about aircraft, "lighter-than-air" means that it's designed to require no additional lift to keep it aloft regardless of cargo. Anything requiring non-aerostatic lift would be considered a hybrid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerostat

[ Parent | on HN ]