I can only speak for Switzerland, but an educated guess is that this is the default just in about every European health insurance system.
And no, you can't be denied (basic) insurance (which covers everything necessary) for a pre-existing condition.
The limits in many European systems appear to be on self-determination. There are real barriers in some circumstances to getting second and third and fourth opinions, additional tests, treatment for infants born premature before a certain week, novel and unproven procedures, etc.
I don't know which healthcare model is preferable. It appears to me the US and European models grew under different historical circumstances and have different failure modes.
Again, not trying to spark debate. Just contributing a personal perspective having lived on both sides.
I'm OK with it too (in fact have used it since my previous employer offered insurance, so why not) as long as people understand that it's a convenience for people for whom time is more important than money and who want to get prompt treatment for things that are important enough to stop you working but not enough to kill you.
Having heard all of the horror stories from the US I was quite worried until he eventually told me how much I had to pay extra - pretty sure it was £4.20. :-)
Best of luck to you and for your kid.
Well, if by "break even" you include the opportunity cost on their capital, yes, though that's not an accounting break-even.
Here's the thing with ACA -- it's a consistent set of terms and conditions that you can shop against. Some of the terms might not exist otherwise, particularly eliminating pre-existing conditions. Ideally insurance companies would price the plans correctly, operate efficiently, and break even. Then Americans would benefit from access to plans with these shared terms.
But here's the scary thing, that $100 million a year could be from 10-100 expensive patients. Unlimited Lifetime Benefits is a pretty awesome term. I really don't know how you write a policy like that.
It is strange to think you could face the independent mandate while also not having any ACA plan to choose from in your marketplace? Is the mandate specifically waived in these cases?